trainedkilla wrote:
Most liter bikes are putting down about 150-160 RWHP. The extra HP you get from a 14 or busa is clearly seen on the street.
We aren't talking about "most liter bikes". We are talking about the 2011 ZX10R which is 197 rwhp real world, on the track. It weighs at least 100, probably 150 pounds less than our ZX14s. Ergo, it will accelerate faster and can have just as fast a top speed since its got equal or better horsepower. There is no reason the ZX10R will be less stable at speed than the ZX14, it was designed, after all, for 190 mph straights on road courses.
Besides, my ZX11 was stable at 200mph, and it is far inferior to both the ZX14 and the new ZX10R.
Curious about your monkiker, "trainedkilla", are you in the military?
Blue07, you won't see good ZX10R pilots because they will be in the mountains with me, on 320 degree uphill hairpins (1st gear to 6k, 2nd gear after 3rd apex - yes, its a nontrivial hairpin, time for 3rd for 30 seconds before the next turn) and stuff like that. Challenging stuff.
Seriously, just because you haven't seen one doesn't negate the performance data. Like, last year Kawasaki finally had a rider in WSB who could ride, but the bike kept throwing him around. This year, its a whole different ball game. Maybe the bike will be better than the rider in 2011.
But you can't spin this away from the facts. A) 2011 ZX10R owns ZX14 on road course, b) 2011 ZX10R will go every bit as fast as a ZX14, every bit as stable, c) Going fast on a near straight road is not something a ZX10R bike would enjoy, if there are mountains nearby.
In other words, no matter how you try to weasle it around, you just can't stand in front of a ZX10R and tell it your ZX14 is a faster bike, or better handling. Thats ludicrous.
Living the Gypsy Life