http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/540/Motorcycle-Video/2009-Daytona-Bike-Week-Day-3.aspx I brought a little entertainment for you all. It says, Welcome "Cody" and Vinny aerial dis ease on over to that bird bike and the cabbage patch dolls is hook Rotty up with one is eat her veggies afta-afta the match.
I am looking at a 360° cycle. No matter if you 90° the opposed crank like a GL or Bmw; no matter if is a V-4/Square-4/V-10/V-12/Straight 6/Slant 6/Flat/V-8/Otto-My-Ride/360° = Rider is 99% of the brand name in front.
Bubba = Jumped from Kawi to Yam = Wins/Wins
Rossi = Jumps on any bike = Wins
Mike The Bike = Comes out of retirement ~ Jumps on bike = Wins
Conclusion - I wanna Hub a Crossplane. WOT/WATThe heck... It sounds/looks compact with a shift rod to bend like a pretzel = I'd try a taste of engineering pie.
It looks to me like an engineer's dream. Squeeze that bike pea tea titty/titty/bang/bang no matter how you fire the Otto = 360° I wanna small bike with lots of bang/bang = Power to weight Ratio. I had a Yam 600 single. Remember that kick only single cylinder? Fit me like a glove at 6'2" and that was a small bike.
Like Kruz said, it's rider/rider/rider that sets the product, OutFrontFirst. If they [the rags] are setting the bike in 4th place, it means they missed the, "Underground."
And I will place guys like Chris Ulrich and the other guys at Cycle World on that list as they are on the road and see the water runoff. But to explain the pitch of the sub and the pitch of the WATT as opposed to the WOT I think they see is the pitch of the runoff is why the road is pitch and the tires wear to the right if you head west as opposed to the east side that will wear your tire to the inside. < [Yes, I called some guy explaining why the tire is worn on the right side more then the center was the pitch of the road and yes, I said, "stretch" was his theory]. I am more trying to relay as far as an unbiased look at the engineering.
They are missing something in that ride and I could find out in 200 feet or less what that crossplane is all about. It is going to chunk out a sound and a bump on the tire pulse X's 4 = 360° Therefore the need of the feet to find out.
Remember how lag/lazy the first year 14 was? Way back when the Busa was suppose to be such a handler and you see the 14 ahead of the Busa in that fast track [you know that video with the busa in the back with the camera mount] where it is eaten up on that long straight. So, you have a lot of opinions that miss the finer points of the engineering. That bike has a few safety features like an oil level shut off.
I am sure that was not in the brochure about the oil deal because it is like a code. And you do not show a computer backup system but rather call it a more general name like: "The 14 comes with DFI with it's 44 mm throttle bodies" or something to the effect that why bring up some code that flashes for the bike's safety that has been built-in since FI has to deal with that square wave or whatever wave [for argument sake].
So, the more square waves on the bike, the more my assfactor begins to smile wider. You get the young guns on the bike and they want fast and if it is not at that throttle out of the crate, then something went faster with a different setting on the square wave. AS IF the waves are not in both bikes?
So, I rather ride one than to read one. I read and it is more or less from their ass is they cough it out is asscoughing. Don't get any on ya. It's more the anal retentive like Krus I would rather read that you get noneonya.
Did we walk the bike quick? I did and I had to run. But what I saw I would surely rip it apart and make it my own hack job. If they are sitting on the floor and not moving because of the print, how much can you rely on that if there is a rider on that 14 that was smoking that Busa all over that track.
So, is it the bike or the rider that is missing what that bike has behind door #2. Technically, they made so many engines run forward and backward that no matter the crank throw, you go no place gain nothing with the crank configurations....
Here is one for the aircraft boys... Which puts out more HP per CI... An in line RR engine they used long ago in the "Miss Budweiser" racing boat hulls. How about that piston position of the cylinders where they follow the crank around with their own cylinders 360° = Was it the intake system or the cylinder lay out?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/F4U-4_Bu97388_front_view.jpg
Tormenting the motorcycling community one post at a time