I'm considering some slip-ons for two reasons, the first being the most important; The heat coming off these cats. The thermometer on my patio today topped 117, and this exhaust is a leg-roaster. (And I'm not crazy about the overly long (to my eyes) stock cans)
The second reason, I'm not as certain about. I have a ZZR1200 w/D&D slip ons, and that f'r is loud. I'd like a little more growl than stock, perhaps, but I'm going to go for full-length silencers with a fairly mellow/deep tone if I do a change.
For a pretty conservative/quiet slip-on, I have to believe that the air-fuel mixture would remain so similar that the stock tuning/02 sensors would cover that difference easily. Sure can't see holing a piston, but even wonder about any signifcant change in the torque curve. There is an exhaust dyno-comparison elwhere on this site, and both slip-ons and full systems were tested with no reported freakouts in AFR with the computer tuning as stock.
But I'm really surprised by the OP's assertion that slip-ons alone moved his powerband up 2,000 rpm. I know that the change in sound alone will sometimes cause a change in the way we throttle/shift the bike; where we like to hear it, as it were.. Could this be a more plausable answer? I do like the bottom-end grunt of this 2010 model..